A newly filed legal petition from multiple health advocacy and farm worker coalitions is demanding the Environmental Protection Agency to stop authorizing the use of antimicrobial agents on produce across the United States, pointing to superbug proliferation and health risks to farm laborers.
The farming industry applies around 8m lbs of antimicrobial and fungicidal pesticides on American produce annually, with several of these chemicals restricted in other nations.
“Each year the public are at increased threat from harmful bacteria and illnesses because pharmaceutical drugs are applied on crops,” stated Nathan Donley.
The excessive use of antibiotics, which are critical for combating human disease, as agricultural chemicals on fruits and vegetables threatens public health because it can cause antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Likewise, excessive application of antifungal pesticides can lead to mycoses that are less treatable with currently available medicines.
Additionally, eating antibiotic residues on produce can disturb the intestinal flora and increase the chance of persistent conditions. These chemicals also taint aquatic systems, and are thought to harm bees. Typically low-income and Hispanic farm workers are most exposed.
Farms use antibiotics because they destroy bacteria that can ruin or kill plants. Among the popular antimicrobial treatments is streptomycin, which is often used in medical care. Data indicate up to 125k lbs have been sprayed on American produce in a one year.
The legal appeal is filed as the regulator encounters urging to increase the use of pharmaceutical drugs. The bacterial citrus greening disease, transmitted by the vector, is destroying citrus orchards in southeastern US.
“I understand their desperation because they’re in serious trouble, but from a societal point of view this is definitely a obvious choice – it should not be allowed,” the advocate said. “The fundamental issue is the significant problems caused by spraying pharmaceuticals on food crops far outweigh the crop issues.”
Experts suggest simple farming steps that should be tried initially, such as planting crops further apart, breeding more hardy types of plants and locating infected plants and promptly eliminating them to stop the pathogens from spreading.
The petition provides the regulator about five years to respond. Several years ago, the organization outlawed a chemical in answer to a parallel regulatory appeal, but a judge reversed the EPA’s ban.
The agency can enact a restriction, or is required to give a justification why it will not. If the regulator, or a future administration, does not act, then the groups can take legal action. The procedure could require over ten years.
“We are pursuing the long game,” the expert concluded.
A seasoned tech writer and software engineer passionate about exploring emerging technologies and sharing knowledge.