In spite of all the established progress of contemporary medicine, some people are drawn to alternative or “natural” cures and practices. Many of these do no harm. As a cancer specialist noted in the past year, people undergoing cancer treatment will frequently try meditation or vitamins as well. When such a change is in addition to, and not instead of, scientifically-backed treatment, this is usually not a concern. If it lessens distress, it can be beneficial.
But the explosion of online health influencers poses challenges that governments and regulators in many countries have yet to grasp. A recent inquiry into a particular organization providing membership and advice to expectant mothers has revealed dozens cases of late-term fetal deaths or other serious harm involving mothers or birth attendants associated with it. While the company is headquartered in North Carolina, its influence is international.
“For whole populations, going through labour and birth without professional support is linked to higher levels of risk for mother and baby,” according to a expert of midwifery.
Giving birth without medical assistance, sometimes called free birth, is permitted in nations including the UK and US. The potential dangers are not well understood due to a absence of reliable information. Childbirth can be a frightening experience, and high-quality care is far from guaranteed. In England, a shocking recent report found a large majority of hospital maternity services to be unsafe or in need of improvement.
Criticisms of medical systems and particular, persistent issues with maternity care are in many cases valid. A significant number of the women spoken to for the investigation had previously undergone distressing births.
But while distrust of established systems may be based on experience, it has also become a fertile ground for other influencers looking for converts to their unconventional methods and DIY philosophy. During the pandemic, a “well-being” industry ostensibly focused on healthy living was involved in spreading lies about vaccines and feeding paranoia about official advice.
Concern is rising that such ideas are gaining more general purchase. One paper given at a cancer conference focused on misinformation, which it said had “acutely worsened in the past decade”. This investigation shows that behind the facade of an rebellious sisterhood lies an operation that coaches women as social media influencers as in addition to birth attendants. The group does not present itself to be a certified medical provider.
There is no turning the clock back to a time when doctors were assumed to know best. Huge quantities of scientific research are published online and many people use these to positive effect. But there is also a need for safeguards from poor advice. It is widely understood that the automated systems used by tech companies reward increasingly sensational content.
In the UK, necessary reforms to maternity services are urgently needed. They should include the choice of home birth and the availability of data to support women in choosing their care. Policymakers and bodies such as the World Health Organization should also create strategies for the online information landscape so that evidence-based healthcare is not undermined.
A seasoned tech writer and software engineer passionate about exploring emerging technologies and sharing knowledge.