Imagine this: a happy the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, juxtapose it with a sad-looking the Slovenian forward sporting United's jersey, appearing like he just missed an open goal. Don't bother locating an actual photo of that miss; context is your adversary. Now, add statistics in a big, silly font. Don't forget the emojis. Share it across all platforms.
Would you mention that Højlund's tally features strikes in the Champions League while his counterpart does not compete in Europe? Of course not. And would you highlight that several of the Dane's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that Denmark is much stronger to Sesko's Slovenia and creates many more chances. You run online for a large outlet, raw engagement is what pays the bills, United are the biggest draw, and nuance is your sworn enemy.
Thus the wheel of online material turns. Your next task is to scan a lengthy interview featuring Peter Schmeichel and find the part where he calls the acquisition of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where Schmeichel prefaces his comments by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, cut that. Nobody wants that. Just ensure "strange" and "Sesko" are paired in the headline. The audience will be outraged.
Mid-autumn has traditionally one of my preferred times to watch football. Leaves fall, winds shift, squads and strategies are still fresh, all is novel and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the coming months are staking their claims. The summer market is closed. Nobody is talking about the quadruple yet. Everyone are in contention. Right now, all is possibility.
Yet, for many of the same reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my most disliked times to consume news on football. Because although nothing has yet been settled, opinions must be formed immediately. Jack Grealish is reborn. Florian Wirtz has been a major letdown. Is Antoine Semenyo the top performer in the league at this moment? We need a decision now.
In many ways, Sesko feels like the archetype in this respect, a player inextricably trapped between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The imperative to withhold final conclusions, to let technical development and strategic understanding to mature. And the demand to generate permanent verdicts, a conveyor belt of opinions and memes, context-free criticisms and meaningless contrasts, a square that can not truly be circled.
It is not my aim to provide a substantive analysis of Sesko's time at Manchester United to date. The guy has started four times in the top flight in a wildly inconsistent team, scored two goals, and had a mere of 116 touches. What exactly are we evaluating? Nor will I attempt to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts duel thrillingly on a podcast over whether he needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this year (one pundit), or whether it's really more like 12 or 13 (Wright).
For all this I enjoyed watching Sesko at Leipzig: a powerful, fast racing car of a striker, playing in a team ideally suited to his talents: afforded the license to attack but also the freedom to miss. And in part this is why Manchester United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the largest and most pitiless gulf between the time and air he requires, and the opportunity he is going to get.
We saw an example of this over the national team pause, when a widely shared infographic handily informed us that the player had been deemed – decisively – the worst signing of the summer transfer window by a poll of football representatives. Naturally, the press are by no means alone in this. Club channels, online personalities, unidentified profiles with a oddly high number of pornbot followers: everybody with a vested interest is now essentially operating along the same principles, an ecosystem deliberately geared for controversy.
Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What is happening to ourselves? Do we realize, on some level, what this infinite stream of aggravation is doing to our minds? Quite apart from the inherent strangeness of being a player in the middle of it all, knowing on a bizarre chain-reaction level that every single thing about them is now essentially material, product, open-source property to be repackaged and traded.
And yes, in part this is because United are United, the entity that keeps nourishing the narrative, a big club that must always be producing the big feelings. However, partly this is a seasonal affliction, a pendulum of judgment most clearly and cruelly observed at this time of year, roughly four weeks after the window has closed. All summer long we have been coveting players, praising them, drooling over them. Yet, only a handful of games later, a lot of those very players are now being disdained as failures. Should we start to be concerned about Jamie Gittens? Did Arsenal actually need Viktor Gyökeres necessary? What was the point of Randal Kolo Muani?
It feels appropriate that he meets Liverpool on Sunday: a team simultaneously 13 months unbeaten at their stadium in the Premier League and yet in their own situation of feverish crisis, like submitting a a report on a person who popped to the shops 30 minutes ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah finished. The striker waste of money. Arne Slot losing his hair.
Maybe we have not yet quite grasped the way the storyline of football has started to replace football itself, to inflect the way we watch it, an whole competition reoriented around talking points and immediate responses, an activity that happens in the background while we scroll through our devices, unable to disconnect from the saline drip of takes and further hot takes. It may be this player taking the hit at present. But in a way, we're all sacrificing a part of the experience here.
A seasoned tech writer and software engineer passionate about exploring emerging technologies and sharing knowledge.